Supply chain 27 October 2016

Negotiating with suppliers: How to secure the best deal

Two business women negotiating
It is not in the supplier’s best interest for the buyer to know his or her price point
Approaching the negotiating table with a supplier can be a daunting prospect for the owner of any company. Here, Jonathan O’Brien, CEO of Positive Purchasing, looks at how a small business owner can approach negotiations with confidence and ensure that the finalpriceis a fair one.

how do I know how much I should pay for this is a fair question when planning a negotiation and one I frequently hear being asked by small business owners, especially by those just starting out.

There is a common misconception that somewhere out there lies a magic tool or approach used by the professionals to gain this insight. Sadly, there is no such thing.

In some cases, with a bit of prior effort, research and planning, it is possible to establish with some degree of accuracy what we should expect to pay before we begin negotiating. Unfortunately, perhaps for the majority of negotiations, we go in with very little or no information.

There are lots of different reasons for this complexities, history, market dynamics and market difficulty can all cloud our insight.

There are three’steps that suppliers can take to be opaque.

  1. Maintaining secrecy around commercial information and any statistics that would allow a cost breakdown to be established
  2. Added-value bundles
  3. Implying they have a stronger position and that we need them (even if we don’t)
The final pointis a good example of projected power and is definitely one you should look out for when negotiating.

It is not in the supplier’s best interest for the buyer to know his or her price point, as this would clearly limit their power and possibilities. As a result, a supplier will do their utmost to keep as much data as possible hidden to protect their margins.

To establish what you should be paying with any degree of accuracy ultimately depends on what you are buying.

As a simple example, imagine you are a retailer sourcing bread. By taking into consideration the ingredients and quantities used most of which are commodities that have information on price freely available together with an assessment of labour, manufacturing, transportation and other costs, you can come up with a price.

With a bit of effort, you can even develop a dynamic cost model to track commodity price changes so that you know what you should be paying for bread on any given day. Assuming your analysis is correct, this can be vital information for your negotiating power as it limits the supplier’s options.

However, what would happen if you were to buy a branded bread that your customers expect to see on the shelves? For a start, the cost breakdown becomes less potent since you are buying the additional value of the brand, against which it is difficult to put a cost. Instead, the discussion changes as to how you can get back the most value for a price point higher than the breakdown.

Using a cost breakdown in negotiating can be a powerful tool but it will only work when what you are buying is non-complex and there are many supply options, i.e. you have leverage. It will also only work if you are confident in your analysis.

If your facts and data suggest there is scope for a price reduction, then the supplier only has two possible responses if he or she is willing to engage in the debate.

Response one

The supplier could yield to the argument and concede on price. This could move discussions onto what a fair amount of profit might be, or what added-value elements could be provided.

Response two

The supplier could completely reject the argument. This could, perhaps, be on the basis that your analysis or data is disputed. If this is the case, your next question then becomes: “Please help me see where my analysis is incorrect.”

For a cost breakdown to have any negotiating impact, the supplier needs to engage with the discussion. Once he or she is engaged, it then becomes difficult for them to back out, as highlighted above.


Business development