Will trying to negotiate an early settlement of a dispute prejudice future legal action?
Grid Law founder David Walker returns to dispute resolution by explaining the “without prejudice” rule to help business owners negotiate an early settlement without risking the credibility of future legal action.
If you have ever been involved in a business dispute where someone owes you money or theyve failed to provide a service you have paid for, you will know the feeling of wrestling two conflicting views.
On one hand, emotions are running high and you naturally want to recover as much compensation as possible. You may even have thoughts of putting the other party out of business.
On the other hand, your rational business mind knows you should settle the dispute as quickly as possible. If you don’t, there’s a risk that it will distract you from more important tasks and if you’re not careful your business will suffer as a result.
I had to advise a client facing this dilemma the other day.
My client paid a lot of money for a service that wasnt provided. The service provider gave him high expectations of the results that could be achieved but the reality was very different.
The service was a complete disaster. The service provider didnt do anything they promised and even damaged my client’s business by upsetting some of his important customers.
There was a realistic chance of a quick settlement as the service provider knew they had taken on too much and seriously let my client down. They wanted a quick resolution to the dispute but their offer of settlement was too low.
Read more articles covering dispute resolution:
My client was sure he could resolve this dispute himself and wanted to continue settlement negotiations. However, he was concerned about jeopardising his position in case a settlement wasnt reached and we had to start legal action.
This is an extremely common situation and thankfully our legal system is designed to help deal with this.
The Civil Procedure Rules (the rules that govern how to conduct legal proceedings) contain a series of pre-action protocols. These pre-action protocols are rules that apply (as their name suggests) even before you start formal legal action.
The objective of these protocols is to help the parties resolve their dispute without involving the courts.
To do this, both parties must exchange information about the dispute so they both understand each other’s position. They are then encouraged to negotiate a settlement if they can. If necessary, they should try mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution to help achieve this.
Going back to my client, he was all in favour of trying to settle the dispute. However, his biggest concern was what a judge would think if he tried to claim a much higher amount than the figure being discussed during settlement negotiations.
This isnt something my client needed to worry about because all settlement discussions are held on a without prejudice? basis.
The without prejudice rule? means that all negotiations held with a genuine intent of reaching a settlement are off the record. The judge at the trial won’t know that they have taken place or what was discussed.
Therefore, offers can be made and the parties can make concessions without it adversely affecting their case if a settlement of the dispute isnt reached.
The without prejudice rule is something many people in business have heard of, but very few understand how to apply it correctly. This isnt really surprising if you havent been to law school but getting it wrong can make future legal proceedings a little tricky.
Hopefully I can prevent this by helping you avoid the three most common mistakes I see with it.
The first mistake is people writing without prejudice? on all correspondence
Most correspondence won’t be without prejudice. As I said above, only correspondence written with a genuine intent of reaching a settlement is without prejudice. A letter of claim, for example, isnt without prejudice. You will want the judge to see your letter of claim because it contains full details of the amount you are claiming and why you’re claiming it.
The next mistake I see is that a letter or email is only partially without prejudice
David Walker is the founder of Grid Law, a firm which first targeted the motorsport industry, advising on sponsorship deals, new contracts and building of personal brands. He has now expanded his remit to include entrepreneurs, aiding with contract law, dispute resolution and protecting and defending intellectual property rights.
When someone owes you money, has breached your contract, poached an employee or perhaps stolen your idea, emotions will be running high. You will want to fight back and get even. Your first through may even be to sue them. But should you? more»
Launching a new Business Advice series, Grid Law founder David Walker provides readers with an overview of alternative dispute resolution and explains how mediation can help reach a settlement out of court. more»