Is it time for UK recruiters to set aside their tattoo bias?
A tattoo bias continues to limit the career prospects of individuals sporting body ink, research has suggested, but preconceptions around self-expression could see employers miss out on talent. According to new survey findings, collated by professional network LinkedIn, as many as nine in ten recruitment professionals agreed that visible body art could limit the career progression of an individual, regardless of their skills and suitability for a role. LinkedIn also found that over four in ten recruiters had rejected a suitable candidate on the basis of having a tattoo. These decision makers cited the key reasons why the jobseekers were overlooked. Just under half of recruiters believed general industry intolerance forced their hand, while 46 per cent personally believed a tattoo showed a general lack of professionalism. Meanwhile, 41 per cent had rejected a tattooed candidate due to the employer?s own dress code. Almost one in five UK adults are now believed to have a tattoo, indicating a significantly narrower recruitment pool for employers to search in. Other signs of self-expression had also deterred recruiters from proceeding with job hunters. Over a quarter said visible piercings had seen a candidate miss out, while a fifth had rejected someone on the basis of brightly dyed hair. Despite solid evidence pointing towards a tattoo bias, 80 per cent of jobseekers were convinced they?d never missed out on a position because of their tattoo. ?With almost a fifth of UK adults currently estimated as having a tattoo, the current attitude around visible tattoos and physical image means that businesses and recruiters could be missing out on top talent,? said Rebecca Drew, enterprise sales leader at LinkedIn. ?Despite this, it?s encouraging to see that so many talent professionals are taking active steps to help reduce this bias and encourage more self expression in the workplace.?
Signs of change
Almost two-thirds of recruiters believed the tattoo bias had decreased over the past five years, with employers looking towards phone interviews, virtual reality assessments and online screening among the popular methods used to reduce discrimination in the hiring process. Drew added: ?As we continue to see AI tools incorporated into hiring processes, we hope this will help recruiters remove some of the human bias from the process, and focus on judging candidate potential against the most important things.? Further research previously revealed which UK sectors contained the most tattooed workers, as well as industries the general public were most uncomfortable encountering tattoos.
Praseeda Nair is the editorial director of Business Advice, and its sister publication for growing businesses, Real Business. She's an impassioned advocate for women in leadership, and likes to profile business owners, advisors and experts in the field of entrepreneurship and management.
A strong and reliable workforce is key to the success of any business. You need employees who are hard-working, loyal and above all, talented. But it isn?t always easy to recruit the right talent. more»
If a new employee is not a good fit and leaves after a short period of time, then the company will have to face the cost of a replacement, as well as the time that was lost. So, what should employers do to avoid risks and reduce costs when hiring new people? more»