Recruitment

Is it time for UK recruiters to set aside their tattoo bias?

A tattoo bias continues to limit the career prospects of individuals sporting body ink, research has suggested, but preconceptions around self-expression could see employers miss out on talent.

According to new survey findings, collated by professional network LinkedIn, as many as nine in ten recruitment professionals agreed that visible body art could limit the career progression of an individual, regardless of their skills and suitability for a role.

LinkedIn also found that over four in ten recruiters had rejected a suitable candidate on the basis of having a tattoo. These decision makers cited the key reasons why the jobseekers were overlooked.

Just under half of recruiters believed general industry intolerance forced their hand, while 46 per cent personally believed a tattoo showed a general lack of professionalism. Meanwhile, 41 per cent had rejected a tattooed candidate due to the employer’s own dress code.

Almost one in five UK adults are now believed to have a tattoo, indicating a significantly narrower recruitment pool for employers to search in.

Other signs of self-expression had also deterred recruiters from proceeding with job hunters. Over a quarter said visible piercings had seen a candidate miss out, while a fifth had rejected someone on the basis of brightly dyed hair.

Despite solid evidence pointing towards a tattoo bias, 80 per cent of jobseekers were convinced theyd never missed out on a position because of their tattoo.

with almost a fifth of UK adults currently estimated as having a tattoo, the current attitude around visible tattoos and physical image means that businesses and recruiters could be missing out on top talent, said Rebecca Drew, enterprise sales leader at LinkedIn.

despite this, it’s encouraging to see that so many talent professionals are taking active steps to help reduce this bias and encourage more self expression in the workplace.

Signs of change