Uber returns to court appealing driver rights to paid holiday and minimum wage
In what could fundamentally change Britain’s gig economy, on-demand taxI app Uber is contesting an employment tribunal which ruled its ‘self-employed? drivers should be treated as regular workers.
Over Tuesday and Wednesday, the Court of Appeal will hear Uber’s argument that the tribunal fundamentally misunderstood? how the company operates.
The 2016 ruling
The legal battle began in October 2016 when two former Uber drivers, James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam, successfully won an employment tribunal on the grounds that they were Uber employees, not self-employed drivers.
Uber lost a subsequent appeal in November 2017, when the tribunal decided any driver who had the app turned on had activated a worker’s? contract.
The case is now being heard at the Court of Appeal, while a final part of the appeal process would be heard at the Supreme Court.
According to legal firm Leigh Day, which began legal action against Uber with 25 members of the GMB union, the result of the appeal could have consequences for many other businesses using a gig? model of employment.
Nigel Mackay, partner at Leigh Day, said: This appeal is of great significance not only to Uber drivers but also to millions of other workers in the gig economy and we hope that this can now bring this matter to a conclusion for the benefit of all workers.
__________________________________________________________________________________ A damning insider’s account of working for DeliverooWhat’s it really like working for Deliveroo? Business Advice brings you a damning indictment.
What Uber says
Around 60, 000 licenced drivers are now active across the UK, according to Uber, which also claims it has made changes to its model to give drivers more control over how they operate. The app also cited an Oxford University report which found that drivers make more than the London Living Wage.
“Almost all taxI and private hire drivers have been self-employed for decades, long before our app existed. We believe the Employment Appeal Tribunal last year fundamentally misunderstood how we operate, ” an Uber spokesperson said
“For example, they relied on the assertion that drivers are required to take 80% of trips sent to them when logged into the app, which has never been the case in the UK.”
Praseeda Nair is the editorial director of Business Advice, and its sister publication for growing businesses, Real Business. She's an impassioned advocate for women in leadership, and likes to profile business owners, advisors and experts in the field of entrepreneurship and management.
Following confirmation that on-demand taxI app Uber concealed a data breach affecting 57 million of its users, legal experts have suggested the company would have faced the harshest penalties of incoming data protection rules in 2018. more»
After losing their operating licence in London on 23 September, Uber were once again in the news, as their appeal regarding the employment status of two of their drivers has been heard in the Employment Appeal Tribunal. more»
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled in favour of a group of Barcelona taxI drivers that Uber should be classified as a 'service in the field of transport, within the meaning of European law. more»