The Loan ChargeThe Loan Charge, introduced in the Finance Act 2017 to combat ?disguised remuneration? schemes, was cited in a recent parliamentary report as leaving low-paid workers in unpayable debt. The remuneration schemes, a form of tax avoidance heavily marketed to the self-employed, saw employers pay substantial amounts to an employee benefit trust, and paid to the employee by way of a loan to avoid National Insurance Contributions (NICs). Directed by the government, HMRC has been charging income tax on the value of all loans made under these schemes. The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee produced evidence that suggested loan charges were ?disproportionate and unfair?. An excerpt from Stride’s letter to MPs read
“The Loan Charge legislation itself is not retrospective. The schemes never worked under the law that existed at the time they were used. A number of court successes, including in the Supreme Court, support the view that the payments to the individuals were always taxable as income. Even without the Loan Charge, HMRC would be legally obliged to pursue the tax due.”
Read more HMRC content: HMRC reveals top 10 tax prosecutions of 2018 ?120,000 VAT scam exposed: HMRC sentences small business owner HMRC seizes assets from almost 2,000 small businesses in a yearResponding to confirmation that the Loan Charge will be reviewed, FSB chairman Mike Cherry, said the ?unacceptable? tax was inherently unfair. ?The loan charge is an unfair, retrospective tax grab on self-employed individuals who were acting within the law when they made use of alternative remuneration schemes many years ago. It?s a relief to see the government finally recognise this fact. ?In a lot of cases, these individuals are not financial experts earning huge sums ? many were acting on the advice of big employers or professional third parties. They are people who could lose everything if the loan charge is enforced. ?Retrospective taxation is unacceptable. It?s not fair to change the rule book and throw it at those who played fairly by the old rules in the past.? Meanwhile, ContractorCalculator founder Dave Chaplin emphasised the apparent misrepresentation in Stride?s letter to MPs. ?I am pleased that Ed Davey MP has succeeded in getting this amendment,? Chaplin said. ?Mel Stride?s letter that he circulated was a shocking misrepresentation of the truth. We?re now very familiar with government?s false claim that the Loan Charge isn?t a retrospective tax. But asserting that HMRC would be obliged to pursue the tax regardless implies that the concept of enquiry windows no longer applies to the taxman. They simply have no powers to collect taxes from such a long time ago, particularly from schemes that were legal at the time.? __________________________________________________________________________________
Could self-employed ?tax grab? swing an imminent election? The 40 MPs under threat New research has revealed as many as 85 MPs could lose their seat if they back the introduction of IR35 into the private sector. __________________________________________________________________________________
Sign up to our newsletter to get the latest from Business Advice.