Business development · 13 July 2020

Business Interruption Insurance: What you need to know about the FCA test case

The?Financial Conduct Authority’s?(FCA)business interruption insurance policies testcasewill help to provide much-needed legal clarity forcompaniesexperiencingfinancial losses caused by the coronavirus pandemic, according to an expert solicitor, Cathryn Selby at law firm?Nelsons.

Many businesses that were forced to close as a result of the Covid-19 crisishave made claims for the substantial financial lossesthey have suffered under theirbusiness interruption insurance policies.However, policyholders who believe they have valid claims are reporting thatthesehave beenrejected by their insurers.

The FCA is now taking court action bringing forward a test casethat aims to providemuch neededclarity and certainty for policyholders and insurers.

Cathryn Selby, head of Nelsons? dispute resolution team, discusseswhetherlost profits’suffered during the pandemic arecovered by business interruption insurance, and what the FCA’stest casemeans forbusinesses.’she said: The pandemic has caused widespread disruption. Small businesses, in particular, have found the current economic environment hugely challenging and have placed their hope in being able to make a recovery of at least some of their losses under their business interruption policy.

however, many have been disappointed with the outcome of their claims, and there is a genuine uncertainty over whether specific policy wordings should respond to business interruption caused by the pandemic.”

the FCA’s test case will not provide a comprehensive solution to business interruption disputes, but it is likely to settle some very important points of principle and its ramifications are likely to be felt outside business interruption and in other wider areas of insurance law.

What is business interruption insurance?

business interruption insurance is often provided by way of an extension to an insurance policy most commonly where there is property damage. It provides for insurers to pay lost profitsand/or additional business expenses caused by an insured peril.’so, for example, if a property is damaged by flood and the business cannot operate, cover may be provided for both the flood damage and any loss of profits while the premisesareclosed.

Is Covid-19 covered by business interruption insurance?

most businesses do not have business interruption coverand, of those that do, there are a small number of policies that inarguably cover business interruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic. However, there are many more policies where the position is genuinely unclear.

it’s unlikely that coverage connected to property damage will cover losses arising from Covid-19. But there may be other coverage clauses that do not require damage to thepolicyholder’s property, and, in those cases, the policy will usually set out a list of the insured perils, which can include, for example, infectious or notifiable diseases.”

by way of example, the diseases covered are often specifically listed and some policies include reference to coronavirus? or ‘sARS. Insurers have tended to argue that such wording does not capture the new coronavirus. However, policyholdershave said thatinsurers had the option to define the terms in the policy precisely and chose not to do so, and they must, therefore, bear the cost.

there are a significant number of these types of arguments involving very detailed analysis of specific wording that are taking place between policyholders and insurers and, for that reason, thefCAhas decided to run a test case seeking court declarations as to whether cover is provided by the particular wording of some policies.

Why is legal clarity needed?

the government response to the pandemic involved advice, instructions and legislation that practically prevented many businesses from accessing and using their premises and interfered with the running of the business.

for’some businesses, the advice to close was mandatory butforothers, it was a strong recommendation that staff should operate from home if they could. Insurershave arguedthat this type of guidance was not envisaged by the policy wording which was intended to provide for a local outbreak as opposed to a pandemic and that unless a business ceased to trade completely, its activities were not interrupted.

in response, policyholders have argued that insurers could have chosen to include specific exclusions and did not do so and they must now bear the cost of that inadequate drafting.

How will the test case work?

the test case is being brought as part of the court’s little-used Practice Direction 51M Financial Markets Test Case Scheme. The pilot scheme intended to run from 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2020 is designed to allow cases raising issues of general importance to proceed where authoritative legal guidance is needed immediately. The test case process is a way of obtaining guidance from the court on matters that will affect parties beyond those included in the test proceedings.

the FCA has decided to bring the test case because it determined it could do so more economically and more speedily than individual policyholders whether acting alone or as part of group litigation. Indeed, the speed with which matters have progressed through the courtistruly breathtaking.”


 
TAGS:

ABOUT THE EXPERT

Praseeda Nair is an impassioned advocate for women in leadership, and likes to profile business owners, advisors and experts in the field of entrepreneurship and management.

Business development