Finance · 1 November 2017

City watchdog warns RBS to expect enforced action amid second investigation

City watchdog
The restructuring scandal first emerged in 2014 amid claims RBS had poorly advised small business owners

The financial regulator investigating claims that the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) deliberately pushed small companies into disrepair for financial gain has confirmed that a second inquiry has begun that could lead to stronger action against the bank.

Addressing the Treasury select committee of MPs, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) boss Andrew Bailey said a more detailed investigation into RBS’ Global Restructuring Group (GRG), a unit set up to help restructure struggling firms, had opened in the summer.

After an initial inquiry that resulted in a report yet to be fully published by the FCA, Bailey told MPs that the subsequent investigation “could lead to enforcement action”.

The report from the first investigation has yet to be published in full, though a copy leaked to the BBC  suggested “inappropriate action” – such as interest rates being raised and dubious fees – was encountered by 92 per cent of all businesses working with the GRG. An early report accused the division of offering poor advice to founders with the intention of purchasing their company premises.

“The report is strongly critical of RBS, and I think it is frankly unfortunate that RBS has not in a sense accepted that more readily,” Bailey told the committee, adding that he had told RBS chief Ross McEwan to “get his act together” regarding claims.

Welcoming news of a second investigation into the practices of the GRG, Mike Cherry, chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), emphasised the importance of a “more concentrated” inquiry in reaching justice for affected business owners. 

“We need to get to the bottom of the ‘systematic’ failure to manage the conflict of interest at the heart GRG. What we can’t have is another three-year gap between inquiry launch and delivery,” Cherry said.

FCA chairman John Griffith-Jones also said he “believed” victims of the GRG unit had started the receive compensation. However, Cherry argued that RBS had a responsibility to inform affected business owners of the necessary procedures.

“It’s concerning to hear reports that former GRG customers are unaware of the complaints process set-up to support them. What matters at this stage is that those unfairly treated by GRG receive the redress they’re due. A decade is too long to wait for justice. RBS must ensure that those affected are aware of its complaint process.”

Cherry also warned that the GRG’s legacy went further than damaging the lives of the business owners involved, but instead was representative of a wider mistreatment of small firms during the financial crash in 2008 that had affected the confidence of entrepreneurs.

“The committee is right to flag the long-term damage done to small business appetite for finance as a result of mistreatment during the financial downturn. Only one in ten small firms is currently applying for external finance. There are a number of reasons for this – a perception hangover from the crash is definitely one.”

P2P lenders are struggling to cope with FCA’s tougher regulatory requirements

Sign up to our newsletter to get the latest from Business Advice.


 
TAGS:

ABOUT THE EXPERT

Simon Caldwell is a reporter for Business Advice. He has a BA in politics and communications from the University of Liverpool, and previously worked as a content editor in the ecommerce industry.

Q&A

If you’ve found the article above useful, but have a more detailed and bespoke question, then please feel free to submit a query to our expert. We at Business Advice will get in contact with them on your behalf and arrange for a personalised response. These questions and answers will then be collated on the site for any other readers who have similar queries.

Ask a question

On the up